|
Back to
Articles
| The
World Is Watching
by Bishop Kenneth J. Povish
A serious article in the current issue of
Civilization, a publication of the Library of Congress, states that news reports from
America's death rows regularly flash across the world's television screens: There's been
another execution at one of the dozens of death chambers in the U.S. As news reports of
racial segregation used to do in the 1950s, international criticism of the U.S. is
escalating into outrage over the death penalty now.
Japan, China and
several Islamic countries still have the death penalty, but Amnesty International reported
in 1998 that the U."S'."'has the highest known death-row population on
earth." Executions in America are followed intently overseas, especially in Europe,
where the new European Union has banned capital punishment as simply uncivilized.
Europeans are extremely critical of the stubborn American position because our government
does not hesitate to reproach other countries over human rights violations. the author of
Dead Man
Sister Helen Prejean, Walking, has
become the leading spokesperson for abolition of the death penalty in our country, and her
debating points parallel those of Pope John Paul on the issue: (1) Life sentences without
parole are sufficient to protect the public from dangerous criminals, and they are also a
safeguard if it is later proved that a jury was wrong. (2) Because of court costs and
prolonged litigation, death sentences ultimately cost the taxpayers more than life
imprisonment does. (3) The poor and the minorities are the ones who get shoved into death
row. Rich and white offenders can afford the best trial lawyers and escape it. (4) A
consistent ethic of life dictates that, if it is wrong for individuals to kill one
another, it is wrong for governments, too.
Top of Page |
| Correction On Cohabitation
by Bishop Kenneth J. Povish
According to the received wisdom, cohabitation (living together before marrying) is
supposed to be a sort of internship, a means of ascertaining compatibility before tying
the knot. But because political correctness demands that no one "lifestyle" can
be preferred to others (especially on the basis of traditional morality), cohabitation is
now respected as an acceptable state and not just a pause on the way to matrimony.
Several years ago,
David Popenoc, a social scientist at Rutgers University, published data that contradicted
the received wisdom and supported Christian teaching on marriage. Now Patricia Morgan, a
social science researcher in London, has published a study of European, Australian and
American data that shows none of the assumptions about cohabitation are factual.
Her book,
Marriage-Lite, shows that, as a state in itself, the, average childless cohabitation last
only 15 to 19 months and dissolves before the couple ever marries. Men in cohabiting
relationships earn less, have fewer job prospects and evidence a weaker work ethic.
According to the latest U.S. data, six percent of children in married households were
below the poverty line; but among cohabitants the figure was 31 percent.
Morgan found, as Popenoc did, that the rate of divorce among cohabitants who marry is
higher than among those who had never lived together. Finally, domestic violence among
cohabitants is higher than among married people, and the most dangerous environment for a
child is a home in which lives a man unrelated to the child either by blood or by legal
ties,
In a word, the
evidence s . 4ows that cohabitation is bad for everybody (except ma 'be for lustful men)
and certainly isn't what it's cracked up to be by the popular culture.
Top of Page |
| Following Jesus - anywhere but church
By
Janet Cassidy
Driving along on my
way to school I was enjoying a radio interview with a popular author. Apparently a deeply
spiritual and extremely wellbalanced man, he was discussing his dialogues with God. As he
expressed his beliefs and theology, I delighted in his resonation of my own thoughts. The
longer I listened, the more I started thinking he must be Catholic because so many of his
thoughts agreed with my own Catholic perspective. Not surprisingly, the interviewer
commented that the author had attended Catholic schools and so forth.
About halfway through
the interview came the shock ... "So you don't feel the need, personally, to attend
an organized church?" the interviewer inquired.
"No," came
the reply - although he did recognize.its benefits for some,
I'm not sure what
happened in the second half of the interview because my thoughts froze right there. This
man who has written four books about his relationship with God just voluntarily stopped
receiving Jesus in the Eucharist?
As their words
continued to fill the background of my thoughts, I rationalized that a person can be
spiritual and not go to church, but was he truly wellbalanced? The scales were beginning
to tip unfavorably.
He described the
church (that is, the Body o Christ) as a "God-limiting institution." I
wondered, why would he shut the door on this God with whom he so frequently conversed?
This God for whom he considered himself a messenger? This God who inspired him? This God
who created him? Why would any of us?
I couldn't reconcile
the contradictions. It just didn't make sense that this man could be so close to Jesus,
yet shut him out. There are, however, too many of us who do just that.
Many people of various
denominations believe in God, yet when asked by a spouse or friend to join them in
worship, decline. Why? They simply do not see the need for community. This is really
strange when you think about it, since Jesus, whose example we follow, spent so much time
in communion with others, as well as privately with our Father.
Sadly, after all his
soul searching, books and hours of prayer, the author had rejected the very basic tenet of
Jesus' teaching: "I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me will never hunger, and
whoever believes in me will never thirst" (John 6:35).
This year, celebrate God's
coming to us. Stand before Jesus on Christmas morning and let yourself be
amazed! Come, join your family and friends. Hear and receive the word of life!
Top of Page |
| How
do you use your time?
by Paul R. Leingang
I'm only 15 minutes late. At the time, I thought, that's not too bad. Now as I look back,
I'll never think that way again.
I was on my way to an
interview, and I had not paid careful enough attention to my daily calendar. I was late
for a meeting with Fr. Richard Loehrlein and his brother, Fr. Sy Loehrlein.
Fr. Sy is a priest of
the Diocese of Evansville. Fr. Richard is a Marianist priest, home for a while from
Malawi, Africa.
I listened with a
great fascination as Fr. Richard told me of his work at Chaminade School, a secondary
school for boys and young men near Kawnga, Malawi, Some of the facts were horrifying: the
high incidence of AIDS, the number of orphans, the lack of food.
For many people, there
are days and even months between the time they have eaten the last of the grain from the
previous year and the time when they will harvest the crops of the current year. These are
days of hunger.
Some of the stories
were filled with the power of simple witness.
Fr. Richard went to
see a 16-year-old girl suffering from what seemed to be a fatal snake bite. He anointed
her, gave her Communion and returned home in sadness. A day later, he learned, the girl
was back to normal.
The celebration of the
Sunday Eucharist usually takes two hours. The entrance procession alone, with dancing and
singing, may take 10 minutes. There may be a dozen servers, boys who met earlier in the
week to learn and practice for the Mass. Young girls in white dresses will dance; they,
too, met for practice earlier in the week.
I spent well over an
hour listening to the stories and leaming of the joy and the sadness of a priest who
acknowledga "I live among saints and sinners."
Fr. Richard returns to
his family home for about three months once every three years. That's the pattern he has
followed for much of his life, working in the United States, Ireland, Kenya and now
Malawi.
That's when I felt
ashamed. My late arrival for the interview was not just a matter of "only 15
minutes" now. From a man who had only a relatively short time to be with his brothers
and sisters, I had stolen 15 minutes and I could not give it back.
One of the first
questions discussed in an introductory book for the Christian Family Movement is entitled,
My Time, My Treasure: Where have all the hours gone?
That question usually
leads me to wonder about how little time we all seem to have for time together as a
family. Now, though, I realize there is another way to look at that question. Trying to
regain control of a schedule gone mad is certainly a worthwhile endeavor. Important, too,
is the effort each of us could make to respect the time of another.
How do you use your
time? What would a chart show you about your life if you counted up the minutes of an
ordinary day for sleeping, eating, working, commuting or chauffeuring, praying and
watching TV?
How much time do you
spend in a week preparing for worship? How many days in a year are you hungry? How many
minutes in a day do you listen with all your heart to another?
Take the time today to
spend a few of your minutes in honest reflection on the time you have given to others and
on the time you have take away from others.
Examine your time.
Help others in your family or in your household to take more control of the time that
otherwise might just slip away and be lost.
This week, give 15 good minutes to
someone you would rather ignore. And give some time, too, to the Lord.
Top of Page |
The Catholic Difference
By George Weigel
| Paranoid
secularists and the public schools
More than one observer judgment I respect believes that the Columbine High School
massacre in Littleton, Colo., will be a great turning point in the American culture war.
At the very least, these friends argue, Columbine will empower parents to stand up at
local school board meetings and say, "Wait a minute. Remember what happened in
Colorado? Let's think about this some more..."
Just
how much courage that will still take was made painfully clear a few weeks after the
Littleton horror by an incident at Deer Path Elementary School in Lake Forest, Ill., as
reported by John Kass in the Chicago Tribune.
A small group of
third-grade boys were behaving strangely, at least by the lights of the authorities at the
Deer Path public school. The boys seemed to form a clique. They met on the playground for
what appeared to be curious, even dangerous, rituals. They wore unfamiliar medals around
their necks and made strange gestures during their meetings, where a lot of whispering
went on, rhythmi cally, and in wha sounded like code Ian guage.
Cliques. Incantations
Ritualistic behavior. Th Deer Path authoritie moved quickly to brea up this threat. The
leade of the "clique," a youngster named Christian Neubauer, was called in and
interrogated, as well as the other boys. Teachers and other faculty tried to get them to
inform on each other. What were they doing? Who was in volved? What were these medals?
The boys, it turned out, called
themselves th "Peace Club." They had been praying the rosary an reciting the
Prayer of St. Francis that begins, "Lord, make me an instrument of your
peace..." The medal was the Miraculous Medal.
No problem? Not quite.
One of Christian Neubauer's teachers told him that praying at home was all right, but
praying at school wasn't "1,eave your religious issues at home," she ordered.
Christian's mother, Jennifer, was hauled before the star chamber in the principal's office
and queried about the Marian medals. "How would you feel," the principal asked,
"if your son came home wearing a swasfika around his neck? How would you like it if
we allowed devil worship in the school?"
The inquisitors were obviously
ill-informed about many things. One of the facts of which they were ignorant was Jennifer
Neubauer's resume. Neubauer i an attorney who did not take kindly to the equation o the
rosary with a satanic rite and the Miraculou Medal with the swastika. The school officials
were in formed that they were way out of line, and that eve the Clinton administration had
defended the right o children to pray at school during recess. The inquisition finally
stopped. A school official said that it had all been a misunderstanding.
You bet.
The '
"misunderstanding" is pervasive throughout the secularist educational
establishment in the United States. In the 15 years since Richard John Neuhaus coined,the
phrase, "the naked public square," to suggest what America would look like shorn
of religious symbols, religiously grounded values, and religious ideas, things have gotten
demonstrably worse in some quarters. Some naked public squares have become free-fire zones
in which it is open season on religious conviction and expression. Deer Path Elementary
School was one such zone of officially enforced, state-sponsored secularism, until
Jennifer Neubauer said, "No."
Which brings us back
to Columbine High School. Although this facet of its life was not very extensively
reported at the time of the massacre, Columbine was a dream school, so far as the
Secularist education establishment was conceded. it took values-clarification seriously
(but it didn't teach the virtues). it sepcialized in self-esteem programs (but not in
challenging teenagers to the moral heroism of self-mastery). It was the naked public
square, upper-middle-class division. And it became a killing ground.
The two phenomena
cannot be unrelated. When the only moral absolute taught and enforced in public schools is
political correctness, and when children are regularly subjected to the toxic waste dump
of violence and degraded sexuality that is too much o today's pop culture, no one should
be surprised if the result is drastic moral deformation. Nor should anyone be surprised if
the result of that deformation is ghastly, public and lethal. That is what Columbine
should have taught.
Top of Page |
Life's many
resurrections
Will there be pizza in heaven? Chocolate Easter bunnies? Will I be the
same homemaker, draftsman or teacher than I am now? Will I be parent to my children? Will
I be married? And, if married more than once, married to whom? These are both childish and
serious questions. In a word, they ask, what will it be like after death?
But
these questions are ill founded. People tend to imagine life after death as a continuation
of our present
life. We will have the same family and personality, but with the warts removed. We will be
the same person, without today's faults. This kind of life after death is resuscitation,
not resurrection. The former means life picks up where it, left off; the latter means
stepping into a whole new life. Lazarus was resuscitated; Jesus was resurrected. There's a
world of,difference, and it matters much.
Resurrection means
letting go of the old and passing into a new existence. When we think of resurrection, we
much think outside the box of our present life. We must think "new, different."
We must see new possibilities.
Christ's own
resurrection is the perfect model of this. Jesus did not come out of the tomb, wash the
grime from his body, get dressed and then go meet his friends to say: "Boy, do I have
a story for you!" Rather, Jesus passed into a whole new way of being, physical yet
spiritual, visible yet not seen; touchable yet beyond embrace. It was truly NEW life, not
just an extension of the old.
Belief in resurrection
should not be foreign to us. We experience many types of death and resurrection already in
this life. There are many times we must give up on the old - let it go, let it die. And
then we step into a new life that we've never known before.
Here's what I mean.
Fr. Ronald Rolheiser (whose fine column now appears in The Catholic Times) names some of
the deaths and resurrections we undergo in our lives in his book: The Holy, Longing. He
speaks, for instance, of the death of our youth, health and wholeness. At the age of 40,
60 or 70 we face the death of our healthy physique, bodily strength, our good looks. Our
vitality slips away and our energy ebbs. We can become bitter and pity ourselves, or we
can "step into" life as a 40, 60 or,70-year-old. We are "born" into
that life, where we may not run the marathon, but where we enjoy grandchildren, wisdom and
maturity. Not all bad. Resurrection.
We face the death of
our honeymoons. All honeymoons die. Fifteen years into a marriage, the passion of the
honeymoon can be dead. But not the marriage. We can dream of those romantic first days and
try to bring them back. Or we can "step into" a new marriage relationship, 15
years richer in love and stability, a marriage blessed with children and income. Not all
bad. Resurrection.
Some of us must face
the death of the God of our youth and the church we once knew and loved. We used to feel
so close to God - at our communion, on our wedding or ordination day. Or when we would
hear the bells, sing the Latin and smell the incense. But it's different now. The church
of my youth is dead. But the church itself is very much alive, risen to new life, with a
new spirit, new rituals, new vitality. Not all bad. Resurrection.
All of these - and all
other "deaths" we experience in this life - are part of the great paschal
mystery, Christ's passing from this life, through death, into a new life. Rolheiser calls
the paschal mystery "the secret to life." I call it the strong, driving rhythm
that sets the beat for all of life. Over and over again: Death to life - not just any
life, but NEW life.
The heart of our
Christian life is dying to sin and rising to new life in and with Christ. It begins
sacramentally in baptism and continues in the daily struggles and joys of life. It is the
final destiny for us all.
The sacred days of the
Triduum (Holy Thursday through Easter) celebrate in word and ritual, in song and symbol,
Christ's dying and rising. It's the heart of the church year. "It's the secret of
life." We join all of the dying and rising of our lives to that of Christ.
We can think of Easter
as resuscitation, and ask about pizza and chocolate bunnies in the next life. How much
better to see Easter for what it is: Christ stepping into new life and we with him.
"It's the secret of life." Not all bad. RESURRECTION.
Top of Page |
Rooting out our hatred
Terrorism is an ugly, fearful work that has found its way into our news
and conversation of recent months. It is an evil and God hates evil.
But God cannot be
overcome by evil. Because God has gifted men and women with free will, he permits their
sin and evil deeds. However, he can and does bring good out of the evil some of his
creatures do. God will never be overcome by evil. His victory lies precisely in his
ability to defeat the evil intent of evil men and,,women by allowing good to issue from
the suffering their perverted acts cause.
The evil intentions of
Jesus' enemies sought to silence him forever when they nailed his bruised and torn body to
the cross. But God, through the crucifixion of Jesus, gave the world a savior who, by his
sufferings and death, would forever be a source of strength and courage to all humans.
The wicked enemy was
foiled at his own game. He intended evil but God brought about good instead. Those who
caused Jesus' excruciating sufferings and death were conquered by Jesus' words of loving
forgiveness: "Father, forgive them " and we today are challenged by his
heroic example of forgiveness to do the same.
Had Jesus died cursing
his enemies, evil would indeed have scored a victory over good.
It is impossible to
measure the good that God brought about through Jesus' death. The crucifix has been and is
loved and venerated by millions of believers'. Sinners looking at the mangled body of
Jesus are often moved to repentance and turn to him for forgiveness. Surely, all who look
on Jesus crucified, with more than a passing glance, receive the grace of a deeper love
for the God who so humbled himself, suffered and paid the debt of their sin.
Jesus, meek and humble
of heart, teaches us to love, and to root out of our lives all hatred.
We know that God has,
and continues to bring good from evil. After Sept. 11, many held prayer vigils and opened
not only their hearts but also their purses to help those affected by the loss of loved
one or impoverished by material losses. As a nation we have been enriched by the courage
and good example of our own citizens moved by God's graces to conquer fear and
selfishness.
Top of Page |
| Revealing God's presence in the poor
By Fr.Ronald
Rolheiser,OMI
Several years ago, in Canada's prairies, not far from where I was born and
reared, a man named Robert Latimer killed his severely handicapped daughter, Tracy., He
put her into the family truck, hooked a tube to the exhaust emission, sealed the windows
and doors, and let her fall asleep.
He wasn't malicious in
intent. He loved his daughter. In his mind, this was an act of mercy. He couldn't bear to
see her suffer any longer. Nobody doubted his sincerity. His daughter was almost totally
disabled physically and mentally, lived in constant pain, and there was no favorable
prognosis in terms of her ever getting better or of her pain ever lessening. So he, in as
humane a way as possible,,ended her life.
Her death became a
huge national,.story, a drawn-out court battle that lasted for years, ending up in the
Supreme Court of Canada and a nationwide moral and religious debate that has bitterly
divided families and communities.
The death of this
young girl, Tracy Latimer, raises an issue we can't agree on today: What's the value of a
human life that is severely disabled" What's the value of a life such as Tracy
Latimer's?
Biblically, the answer
is clear. When someone is deemed expendable, for whatever reason, at that moment she or he
becomes the most important person, spiritually, in the community. The stone that is
rejected by the builders is the cornerstone for the building. This means that the Tracy
Latimers within our lives are a privileged place where the rest of us can experience God.
One of the central
revelations of the cross is that there is a very privileged presence of God in the one who
is excluded, in the one of whom society says, "Better that she should die for the
people." Scripture is clear on this. Already in the Jewish Scriptures, we see that
the prophets emphasize the idea that God has special sympathy for "orphans, widows,
and strangers." At that time, these particular groups had the least status, the least
power and were deemed the most expendable. They could be left to die so that society could
get on with its more urgent business.
The prophets' message
was revolutionary: God has a special sympathy for those whom society deems least important
and how we treat those persons is the litmus test of our faith, morals and religiosity.
Jesus takes
this a notch further. In his teaching, not only does God have special sympathy for those whom society deems least important
and most expendable, but God's very presence is identified with them: "Whatsoever you
do to the least of these, you do to me!" Jesus identifies God's presence with the
outcasts, with the excluded ones and he tells us that we have a privileged experience of
God in out contact with them.
Nowhere is this stated more clearly than in Jesus' death on the cross. The crucified one
is the stone rejected by the builders. the one deemed expendable so that normal life will
not be disrupted. But the crucified one is also God and there is a special intimacy with
God that can be had only iii standing, as did Mary and John, near the cross, in solidarity
with the crucified one. the one who is being excluded.
Sometimes that's hard
to see and accept because, unlike Jesus, the excluded ones in our culture are not always
innocent and loving. For example, the Oklahoma bomber, Timothy McVeigh, was executed last
summer. Our society, like the high priest of old, had pronounced its judgment:
"Better that one man should die for the people!" But, unlike Jesus, Timothy
McVeigh didn't radiate innocence, love. moral integrity, repentance, or inmost anything
else that speaks of God's presence. So how is he the cornerstone for our building?
By his exclusion, by
his being deemed expendable, by being the one executed. At the precise moment when his
executioners spread his arms and lashed them to a table and the lethal injection was
brought in, Timothy McVeigh became the Christ-figure - a man helplessly stretched out,
unanimity-minus-one, better off dead for the benefit of others, grist for those who need a
scapegoat, the focus for moral reflection, the central figure in the community and the one
who, for that moment and in that situation, becomes a privileged presence of God because,
as the cross makes plain, God is specially present in the excluded one.
Many of us are
familiar with an incident recorded by Elie Wiesel. In one of the Nazi death camps, a
prisoner had escaped and, in retaliation, the Nazis took a young boy, hanged him publicly,
and forced everyone to watch this horrific spectacle. As the young boy dangled on a rope
in front of them, one man cursed bitterly: "Where is God now?" Another man
answered: "There, on that rope. That's 6od!,,
One of the revelations
of the cross is precisely that, in the crucified one is the presence of God.
Top of Page |
The Abduction Of Values
By Annemarie
Scobey-Polacheck
It seems that each week there is news of a new child abduction. From Milwaukee's little
Alexis on to Utah's Elizabeth Smart, each case has me nauseated and afraid. For a while, I
reacted to stories as if my responsibility as a mother was to asume an abduction could
happen to my two boys anytime. I hovered on the porch as they played in front of the
house. I took note of unfamiliar cars in our neighborhood. My husband and I reviewed
"don't go with strangers" rule and rehashed our these body parts are
private" discussions. We amended our talks about beine nice to everyone and gave our
usually-polite little boys permission to yell scream and bite and kick if anyone
ever-tried to take them. Mostly, we walked the tightrope between not scaring the boys with
too much information and giving them enough to offer some protection.
Protection. The more I
thought about the role my husband and I have as our children's protectors (in addition to
being their cooks, garbage collectors, chauffeurs and entertainers), the less likely
abduction by a stranger seemed and the more likely abduction by society in, general
became. While trangers snatching children is still so rare and that it makes front-page
news, the abduction a child's value system is so common, many of us don't see it anymore.
I decided I needed to
be less worried about some villain lurking in the shadows and more worried about the
dominant American culture kidnapping the souls of my sons.
Every generation of
parents has had its own enemy to fight in terms of protecting their young. Ages ago,
winters, starvation and wild animals posed the biggest danger to children. In the more
recent past, were terrified of polio. Today, the biggest threats to our children are
insidious and in disguise materialism, consumerism and a culture that glorifies violence,
casual sex and self-centeredness and prey on our ehildren on a daily basis.
For the first time in
human. history, many stand gain more - at least in the short term - by corrupting-
children than by caring for them. There money to be made in selling children toys they
don't need and clothes that will go out of style in six months; in convincing them to buy
food that corrodes their arteries and entertainment that corrodes their minds. There is
money to be made in taking teens' natural interest in sex and using it to sell everything
from CDs to TV shows to, glossy girls' magazines. Too many stand to make a huge profit if
they can convince children that in all things, more is not enough.
I realized, as I
watched my little boys play in the front yard, that the Gospel values of living simply,
caring little for possessions and reaching out to the marginalized are not only different,
than the values of society at large, but are actually at odds with those values' And
that's where abduction comes in. Because in order for big corporations to convince my sons
that they need to watch a cartoon with rude or violent characters, buy countless plastic
action figures or judge people by the brands they're wearing, they will first need to
convince my children that the values they have been taught at home are wrong. They will
need to steal our family's - our faith's - teachings. And they're working to do it - with
clever billboards, slick commercials and even by using those child ren whose value systems
they've already stolen..
But my husband and 1,
and many parents we know, are working just as hard. Having been given the gift and
responsibility of parenthood, we are holding tight to our children, even as our culture
strains to pull them from us. We are seeing through the empty promises of commercials and
are teaching our children to do the same. We are deciding that driving past is often
better than driving "thru." We are acting as guardians and protectors of our
children - making decisions.about what music, TV programs and clothes are welcome-in our
home - and which are not. And most importantly, we are. making choices in our own lives
that teach our children that we value helping people and protecting the earth, over buying
more and more stuff.
And yet, I know no
matter what we do, it is still. possible that our children's values may be abducted, for
there are no guarantees. We offer them the best protection we know and send them out into
the world - and we pray they will not be taken.
Top of Page |
|